…from Politico

[ Editor’s Note: The Banana Republicans lose another poorly strategized case as part of their continuing attempt to use the Donald Trump tactic of litigating everything forever that they want, especially if someone else is paying the legal tab.

This case was another circus, on the scale of the election fraud cases where they won one out of 64, but of course their attitude is the 64 don’t matter.

But I have bad news for them. This string of ‘Steal’ lawsuits, most of them filed with no solid evidence behind them, could allow a jury to see a pattern of conspiratorial conduct of trying to Steal the lawsuit by making endless claims to keep the base fired up and donating.

‘Malicious intent’ is critical in getting criminal convictions, and the Banana Repubs should step back and view what they are doing as if the Democrats were doing it to them. How would they go after prosecuting an attempt to throw over an election?

I pose to you they would be doing EXACTLY what the Repubs are doing, minus the Trump theatrics, where he is in a class by himself that no one wants to join… Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

First published January 24, 2022

The Supreme Court will not take up Kevin McCarthy’s lawsuit challenging proxy voting rules in the House, a final nail in the coffin to House Republican opposition to the chamber’s absentee voting procedures prompted by the coronavirus pandemic.

The lawsuit, filed by Minority Leader McCarthy and fellow House Republicans in May 2020, calls the House’s pandemic proxy voting process “unconstitutional,” and has been rejected twice before.

The Supreme Court’s decision to not take up the lawsuit, which the court issued without explanation Monday, means a July 2021 lower court ruling that quashed the challenge will stand.

The lawsuit, filed by Minority Leader McCarthy and fellow House Republicans in May 2020, calls the House’s pandemic proxy voting process “unconstitutional,” and has been rejected twice before. The Supreme Court’s decision to not take up the lawsuit.

The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia unanimously agreed that the courts did not have jurisdiction under the Constitution to weigh in on the House’s rules and procedures. That decision upheld an earlier ruling by a Federal District Court.

You can read the full Politico article here.

SOURCEPolitico

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy