NATO Distances from US as Russia Flexes New Economic Muscle

(Clearly a pro-Russian video)

5
1715

ALERT:  Sourced from Russian State-Controlled Media

Southfront – Amid the ongoing military operations in Ukraine, US President Joe Biden went to Europe, where a NATO summit was held on March 24.

Despite Kiev’s attempts to involve NATO in a war with Russia and establish a no-fly zone over Ukraine, the alliance has once again confirmed its unwillingness to get into a military confrontation with the Russian Army.

Instead, the alliance has decided to strengthen the defense of its own territories. Four additional multinational NATO combat groups of 40,000 troops will be deployed in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia on a permanent basis.

Biden offered to Ukraine to resolve territorial issues with Moscow itself but left the opportunity for the alliance to use force against Russia. The US President noted that NATO could intervene in the conflict in the case of the use of chemical weapons in Ukraine. Given the example of false flag chemical weapon attacks in the war in Syria, the risks of provocation by the Kiev regime and the threat to civilians and military alike on the territory of Ukraine have increased.

Poland’s proposal to deploy NATO military units in Ukraine was rejected. However, this does not exclude the possibility of Poland’s participation in the war in Ukraine outside the alliance. Warsaw intends to introduce its contingent in the western regions of Ukraine to support the “fraternal Ukrainian people” and not miss the opportunity to establish its own control over the historically disputed territories. Apparently, this will be the main topic of negotiations between Biden and Duda on March 25.

If Biden allows Poland to send troops to Ukraine, it will most likely push Belarus to enter into the conflict in order to take control of the regions of Polesie and Volyn.
The Kiev authorities have completely destroyed the sovereignty of the state, and in the new realities, Ukraine risks losing almost all its territories and ceasing to exist.
At the same time, NATO member countries continue to participate in the conflict through the deployment of mercenaries sent to Ukraine as volunteers, and through weapon supplies. European leaders are noting that their ability to continue supplying military equipment is also limited.

On March 24, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that the UK will provide Kiev government forces with 6,000 missiles, in addition to the 4,000 NLAW and Javelin anti-tank missiles already supplied. Johnson declared his readiness to consider Zelensky’s request for the transfer of tanks and aircraft for the AFU. However, realizing the risks and the price of such supplies, he complained about some difficulties with logistics.

The reaction of Western countries to military operations in many ways reaches the absurd and confirms that their leaders are largely unaware of the realities of the new emerging world order.

Joe Biden at a press conference in Brussels called for the exclusion of Russia from the G20 despite the lack of support for such a decision from all members of the organization. He called for inviting Ukraine to take Russia’s place to participate in the upcoming summit.

The official representative of the Chinese Foreign Ministry commented on the issue and noted that Moscow is an important member of the G20, and no country has the right to exclude another country.

Europe is outraged that Moscow is taking retaliatory measures against the imposed sanctions.

The head of the European Commission has said that Russian oil and gas companies “will not be allowed to demand payment for fuel in rubles.” despite the fact that there is no more effective means of putting pressure on the Russian companies.

The hysteria of Western leaders over Russia’s transition to payments for the supply of energy resources in rubles demonstrates that the Western leadership still cannot realize and accept the new reality. Today, the shouts of Washington, London and Brussels have become perceived only as an annoying squeak by Russia, as well as by a number of world political centers.

Initially, the reason for the entire conflict in Ukraine was the West’s attempts to solve its own economic problems at the expense of Russian resources. The economies of Western countries are slowly but surely moving towards collapse. One of the few ways out is to get access to large quantities of cheap energy, natural resources, and foodstuffs. This could only be achieved by dividing Russia into several small parts that are in a state of permanent conflict under Western control.

The West has brainlessly destroyed almost all the means of interaction, and therefore of pressure on Moscow on its own.

The dynamics of the development of geopolitical and geoeconomic processes are highly likely to lead, to a pan-European military conflict in the foreseeable future at best. In the worst case, they may lead to a global nuclear war.

Source:  Southfront

SOURCESouthfront.org

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

5 COMMENTS

  1. When Biden was “elected” President, I was ridiculed by friends and relatives for not voting for him.
    I told them that before he finished his first and only term, they will be crying the blues about how disappointed they are with him. I told them that he will never fulfill ninety eight percent of his promises, and of course they laughed in my face. Well this is just the beginning of the end.
    We are headed for a full blown war with Russia, China, and Iran, which is not going to end well.

  2. My analysis of Biden before the election was 90% chance of war. I would increase that to 100% chance now, and warn again, if we do not pull back from this, the year of { Very Bad }, will be 2023.
    Whatever anyone thinks they stand to gain, is wrong. Nobody wins.
    This is a soft war, getting harder each day. And we are maliciously feeding it from a continent across the world, or so we think. I have never even packed a bug out bag, or even stocked food during anything. My stance on this has changed. We traded a pugnacious punk for an easy handler. They are cornering a person with nukes, and hoping he uses one.

    • Yup. It’s really hard to believe any of the Biden agenda except to say he is completing the middle class suicide mission started way back by Ronnie Ray Gun and the fall of the wall. Russia has always been the target, and our dalliance in the Middle East was just a quick hitter against weak oil producing countries. Russia was always the big prize. Will it be a Waterloo for Biden and NATO? Can the world dance around a catastrophe until 2024 when this old fool will be bounced from office?

  3. Well the good news is us on Main Streets around the world will be F$$$$$. The main thing is no one in the 1% will be harmed/sn
    Amerika defeats Germany for the third time in 100 years.

  4. “So, basically, the US operation against Russia has been like a situation where a guy breaks into your house and is waving around a gun at your family, then he goes ahead and puts the gun in his mouth and blows his own brains out. You’re going to have to clean the brains off the wall, and repair the locks on the door, but otherwise you’re going to be good. The intruder, however, is not so good. He’s just blown his own brains out.” – Andrew Anglin, Unz Review

Comments are closed.