DISCLOSURE: Sourced from Russian government funded media
Written by Julie Lévesque, originally published on GlobalResearch
This incisive article by Julie Lévesque was first published on March 6, 2014, in the wake of the EuroMaidan “regime change”.
Under the new government, Yarosh is the leader of the Neo-Nazi Right Sector delegation to the Ukraine Parliament. His close friend and political partner Andriy Parubiy co-founder of the Neo-Nazi Social-National Party of Ukraine (subsequently renamed Svoboda) was appointed by the new government to the position of Secretary of the National Security and National Defense Committee (RNBOU), a key position that oversees the Ministry of Defense, the Armed Forces, Law Enforcement, National Security and Intelligence. Right Sektor leader Yarosh was appointed to the number 2 position at RNBOU. Have the Neo-Nazis cornered Ukraine’s National Security agenda?
Welcome to “The New Normal”
In the following video filmed in the Ukrainian Parliament and posted in late December 2013, we can clearly see on the pillars two flags that are listed in the Anti-Defamation League’s (ADL) “Visual Database of Extremist Symbols, Logos and Tattoos”: the White power flag and the Confederate flag.
The Celtic Cross is categorized by the ADL as a “General Racist Symbol” representing “International white pride” and used by Neo-Nazis and White supremacists.
From left to right: Confederate flag, White power flag, and Svoboda party flag.
Max Blumenthal, as well as many other authors, described the fascist essence of the political groups involved in the overthrow of the elected government in Ukraine:
One of the “Big Three” political parties behind the protests is the ultra-nationalist Svoboda, whose leader, Oleh Tyahnybok, has called for the liberation of his country from the “Muscovite-Jewish mafia.”
After the 2010 conviction of the Nazi death camp guard John Demjanjuk for his supporting role in the death of nearly 30,000 people at the Sobibor camp, Tyahnybok rushed to Germany to declare him a hero who was “fighting for truth.” In the Ukrainian parliament, where Svoboda holds an unprecedented 37 seats, Tyahnybok’s deputy Yuriy Mykhalchyshyn is fond of quoting Joseph Goebbels – he has even founded a think tank originally called “the Joseph Goebbels Political Research Center.”
According to Per Anders Rudling, a leading academic expert on European neo-fascism, the self-described “socialist nationalist” Mykhalchyshyn is the main link between Svoboda’s official wing and neo-Nazi militias like Right Sector. (Max Blumenthal, Is the US Backing Neo-Nazis in Ukraine?, Alternet, February 25, 2014)
Numerous reports have exposed the links between the U.S. government and Svoboda, and several pictures show U.S. and European authorities with the controversial Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok.
U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland with Oleh Tyahnybok (left)
U.S. Senator John McCain with Oleh Tyahnybok (right).
High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the European Union Catherine Ashton and Oleh Tyahnybok (left).
European Union Enlargement Commissioner Stefan Fuele (center) and Oleh Tyahnybok (right).
The ADL, which has expressed its concern about the Svoboda party, has yet to condemn U.S. and European support for it. In a statement published on February 28, ADL’s National Director Abraham H. Foxman writes:
The Ukrainian Jewish community is nervous. The ultra-nationalist Svoboda party, with its history of anti-Semitism and platform of ethnic nationalism, won more than 10 percent of the vote in October 2012, shared the political leadership of the Maidan revolution over the past months, and just this week received three ministries in the new Ukrainian government.
While Svoboda’s leaders have refrained recently from making anti-Semitic statements, it is troubling that Oleksandr Sych, Svoboda’s chief ideologue, was named vice prime minister. Sych’s speeches over the years have focused on promoting Ukrainian nationalism, which he says is exemplified by Stepan Bandera, a leader of the Ukrainian nationalist movement of the 1930s and 1940s. Bandera was at times aligned with the Nazis during World War II and was complicit in the mass killings of Jews and Poles by Ukrainian partisans…
Dmitro Yarosh, leader of Right Sector, met with Israel’s ambassador to Ukraine, Reuven Din El, and told him that their movement rejects anti-Semitism and xenophobia and will not tolerate it.
Ukrainian Jewish journalist Eleonora Groisman interviewed Sergei Mischenko, the leader of “Spilna Sprava,” and told him that Ukraine’s Jews were worried about the nationalists. Mischenko responded that Jews will not have any problems and shouldn’t worry. He went on to say, “On the Maidan, there were Jews with us who served in the Israeli Defense Forces. We got along excellently and fought shoulder to shoulder…”
Will Svoboda accept Jews as full-fledged Ukrainians and follow the welcome assurances of the armed nationalists? Or will the promises of the Right Sector and Spilna Sprava be overtaken by the ethnic nationalism of Svoboda? (Abraham H. Foxman, In Ukraine, New Government Must Reassure Jewish Community, The Huffington Post, February 28, 2014)
The ADL doesn’t address the fact that former Israeli soldiers fought alongside known neo-Nazi militants who now claim to reject antisemitism. This sends the paradoxical message that neo-Nazism is somehow acceptable. It is worth noting that the US media as well as the ADL refrain from using the terms “neo-Nazi”, neo-fascist, and “extremist”. Instead of condemning this abnormal alliance, the ADL sees a glimmer of hope in the “promises of Right Sector and Spilna Sprava”, groups that the Israeli media itself qualified as “fascist and neo-Nazi”.
Along with similar fascist and neo-Nazi groups such as Spilna Sprava (Common Cause) and Afgantsy (a coalition of veterans from the Soviet war in Afghanistan), Pravy Sektor has played a key role both in seizing government buildings and providing security for the sprawling protest camps against riot police. (Ari Soffer, Ukraine: Neo-Nazi Militia Leader Threatens ‘Civil War’, Arutz Sheva, February 5, 2014)
Israel’s Haaretz also reported that members of Svoboda and Pravy Sektor, were “flying flags with neo-Nazi symbols” and were “distributing freshly translated editions of Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in Independence Square.” (Anshel Pfeffer, The new dilemma for Jews in Ukraine, February 25, 2014)
The Anti-Defamation League should not only firmly condemn the presence of all the fascist and neo-Nazi groups in the post-coup Ukrainian government, but also denounce the countries which support them morally and/or financially, like the U.S., Canada, and member countries of the European Union.
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy
“The Celtic Cross is categorized by the ADL as a “General Racist Symbol” representing “International white pride” and used by Neo-Nazis and White supremacists.”
(A) (D)amned (L)ie. Never in my many years have I ever heard of the Celtic Cross being a racist symbol. Celtic riots in Boston against Jews? Celtic riots in Glawgow against Jews? Yes, there are many racists and bigots among the Irish – everywhere; but to point to the Celtic cross as a racist symbol is baloney and Foxman and his ilk are more than a little ingenuous in making the charge. I dare you stand under the Celtic Cross at Gettysburg and make that accusation Mr. Foxman.
The ADL also believes the lie of the Limerick Pogrom (1904) spread far and wide by the lying Khazar media for one hundred years. No houses were razed, no properties burned, no one was killed or seriously injured and only after a Rabbi was hit on the head by a stone was someone arrested and jailed for six months. The Israeli ambassador was moved to admit there was no ‘pogrom’. Khazar propensity for exaggeration knows no bounds.
Here’s why “The Celtic Cross is categorized by the ADL as a “General Racist Symbol” representing “International white pride” and used by Neo-Nazis and White supremacists.” IMHO
The JudeoZionists, like Foxman, et al, have a long history of attacking Christianity. Today it’s wide open for everyone to see.
“The Overthrow of Christian Civilization” Henry Makow April 5, 2022 Anyone who thinks Judaism and Christianity have anything in common is a fool. Christian and Jewish assumptions are antithetical. They haven’t stopped crucifying Jesus. by Henry Makow PhD
This is from the JudeoZionists’ Talmud— Attacks Christians and their Books— Sanhedrin 90a. Those who read the New Testament will have no portion in the world to come.; Shabbath 116a (p. 569). Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament.
From Henry Ford’s “The International Jew” Chapter 7—
Under cover of the ideal of Liberty we have given the Jews liberty to attack Liberty. What America has been tolerating is intolerance itself. Let us look rapidly down the years and see one phase of that attack. It is the attack upon Christianity. Here are a few items from the record. They are recorded over a period of years following the rise of Jewish power in America:
1899-1900. The Jews attempt to have the word “Christian” removed from the Bill of Rights of the State of Virginia.
1906-1907. The Jews of Oklahoma petition the Constitutional Convention protesting that the acknowledgment of Christ in the new State constitution then being formulated would be repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.…
1907-1908. Widespread demand by the Jews for the complete secularization of the public institutions of this country, as a part of the demand of the Jews for their constitutional rights. Supreme Court Justice Brewer’s statement that this is a Christian country widely controverted by Jewish rabbis and publications. Jews agitate in many cities against Bible reading. Christmas celebrations or carols in Philadelphia, Cincinnati, St. Paul and New York met with strong Jewish opposition.
Comments are closed.