
DISCLOSURE: Sourced from Russian government funded media
SouthFront: Even without Ukraine being a NATO member-country, that land has already become Americaâs initial battlefield against Ukraineâs next-door-neighbor, Russia, thus effectively starting World War III against Russia; and, so, Ukraine is enormously boosting the profits of U.S.-and-allied âdefenseâ contractors, such as Lockheed Martin Corporation, the worldâs largest weapons-seller.
Though Ukraine is the land, and though Ukrainians are the U.S. regimeâs proxy-soldiers in this initial stage of World War III, it is mainly American armaments-firms that are enormously benefitting from the resultant global surge in weapons-purchases.
Itâs Ukrainiansâ and Russiansâ blood, and U.S.-and-allied billionairesâ profits, that are now being promoted in their U.S.-and-allied ânewsâ-media, as being the heroic war for âdemocracyâ and âto defend freedomâ, though, during the many decades before, in Afghanistan, and in Iraq, and in Syria, and in Libya, and in Yemen, and in so many other lands which have been cursed by Americaâs violent presence, the U.S. regimeâs promised âchampionship of democracy and of the rules-based international orderâ, turned into the reality of U.S.-and-allied ârulesâ, and of rampant violations of international laws, as being the delivered U.S.-and-allied âorderâ there.
Russia and China are being demonized, by the U.S. regime, as âauthoritarian statesâ, and as violators of human rights, while Americaâs billionaires, who control the U.S. regime and its ânewsâ-media and its armaments-manufacturers, reap the rewards of this â the most massive of all global con-games against the entire global public.
Here are some recent developments, in Americaâs actual (though not yet formally announced) war against Russia:
On April 12th, Jeff Bezosâs Washington Post bannered âPentagon looks to vastly expand weapons for Ukraineâ, and reported that, âThe Biden administration is poised to dramatically expand the scope of weapons itâs providing Ukraine.â
On April 13th, Russiaâs RT News headlined âUS issues Russia sanctions warningâ, and reported that,
During an event at NATOâs Atlantic Council adjunct, [U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet] Yellen plans to insist that Washington remains fully committed to pushing Russia âfurther towards economic, financial, and strategic isolation,â according to an excerpt quoted by the media.
âAnd letâs be clear, the unified coalition of sanctioning countries will not be indifferent to actions that undermine the sanctions weâve put in place,â Yellen will say.
In her opinion, the measures being imposed on Russia by the US and its allies are necessary because the future of the international order, âboth for peaceful security and economic prosperity,â is now at stake.
Also on the 13th, the New York Times bannered âThe U.S. has expanded intelligence sharing with Ukraineâ, and reported that âThe United States has increased the flow of intelligence to Ukraine about Russian forces in the Donbas and Crimea,â so as to increase the likelihood that Ukrainian forces will retake Crimea, which the Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev, a Ukrainian, had arbitrarily transferred to Ukraine in 1954, and which had been a part of Russia ever since 1783.
Because there was such intense opposition by the Crimean population to this transfer, the Ukrainian government was obliged to grant to Crimea a special status as being a self-administered region, not controlled by the Ukrainian government in Kiev. But, now, the U.S. regime demands instead that Crimea become an integral part of the Ukrainian regime, especially because Crimeans are passionately opposed to doing that, just as they had been back in 1954, when Khrushchev (a less barbaric dictator than todayâs U.S. regime is) transferred it to Ukraine.
The U.S. is also opposed to the residents in the breakaway Donbass portion of that pre-U.S.-2014-coup Ukrainian region, where over 90% of the residents had voted for the democratically elected Ukrainian President whom U.S. President Barack Obama had overthrown in a bloody U.S. coup (âdemocratic revolutionâ) in February 2014. So, the U.S. Biden Administration, set upon bringing about World War III, is likewise assisting its Ukrainian stooge-regime to grab back that former region of Ukraine, against which that U.S.-stooge-regime had been trying to eliminate as many of the residents there as it could.
The idea behind Americaâs âintelligence-sharingâ with their stooge-regime is to provide U.S. satellite and other secret intelligence information to Americaâs stooge-regime there, in order to assist them to conquer not only the residents in both Donbass and Crimea, but also to conquer the Russian military forces in Crimea, which region of the former Ukraine had voted over 95% in March 2014 to leave Ukraine and rejoin Russia, and which region has had, ever since 1783, Russiaâs largest naval base (which naval base Obama had been intending to become instead yet another U.S. naval base).
Also on the 13th, Defense News bannered âNATO planners put the F-35 front and center in European nuclear deterrenceâ and reported, regarding that Lockheed Martin fighter-plane:
Following Germanyâs decision to buy a fleet of F-35s, NATO planners have begun updating the allianceâs nuclear sharing mechanics to account for the jetâs next-gen capabilities, a key NATO official said this week.
âWeâre moving fast and furiously towards F-35 modernization and incorporating those into our planning and into our exercising and things like that as those capabilities come online,â said Jessica Cox, director of the NATO nuclear policy directorate in Brussels.
âBy the end of the decade, most if not all of our allies will have transitioned,â she added, speaking during an online discussion of the Advanced Nuclear Weapons Alliance Deterrence Center, a Washington-based think tank. âŠ
The United States military stores around 150 B-61 gravity bombs in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Turkey for that mission, according to a recent accounting in an article by the British-based Chatham House think tank. âŠ
Most recently, the new German government picked the F-35 specifically for the nuclear sharing mission, committing to up to 35 copies. The decision followed a lengthy discussion in Germany about Berlinâs continued participation in the nuclear sharing responsibility in the first place, a debate that appears to have abated following Russiaâs invasion of Ukraine.
Cox said the aircraftâs advanced features also will boost the capabilities of alliance members and F-35 customers like Poland, Denmark or Norway who might be tasked with supporting actual nuclear sharing missions.
The U.S. Congress hasnât yet declared war against Russia, but over 97% of the members in the U.S. Senate and House have voted for the sanctions, and the military appropriations bills, and the other anti-Russian legislation, to assist the U.S. regime to conquer Russia. So, pulling the plug to start the official war seems now to be almost a mere formality, so late in âthe gameâ.
The U.S. regimeâs intentions toward Russia have been conquest ever since U.S. President Harry S. Truman made that decision on 25 July 1945, and it stayed that way even after the end of the Soviet Union in 1991. Americaâs anti-Russia alliance, NATO, has always been committed to conquering Russia, and remains so today.
For example, NATOâs chief Jens Stoltenberg has always said, and repeated it recently, that âNATO is not a threat to Russia.â How much contempt, against the public, must such a person, who says such a thing, in such circumstances, and with such a long history behind it â all of which has been to the exact contrary of that personâs statement â have?
However much it is, thatâs how much contempt of the public he has. The blatancy of his lying is shocking. But itâs normal for NATO, which also makes this type of blatantly false allegation an intrinsic part of their commitment to being Russiaâs enemies, such as their official statement on 26 February 2022:
âNATO has tried to build a partnership with Russia, developing dialogue and practical cooperation in areas of common interest. Practical cooperation has been suspended since 2014 in response to Russiaâs illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea, Ukraine, which NATO will never recognise.â
(It wasnât âillegalâ; Obamaâs coup in Ukraine was.) But that âpartnership with Russiaâ didnât exist even when Boris Yeltsin was Russiaâs President and, as the New York Times headlined on 21 December 1991, âYeltsin Says Russia Seeks to Join NATOâ, yet NATO never gave more than perfunctory consideration to his repeated proposal. And as U.S. President G.H.W. Bush secretly started informing U.S. allies on 24 February 1990, the Cold War was to continue on the U.S.-and-allied side until Russia itself becomes conquered, no matter how friendly toward them Russia might be or become.
Russia never invaded America and has never even threatened to do so except as being what they would do if America pushes them too far into a corner â comes at all close to trapping them (such as the present Biden regime is trying to do). The aggressor has always, ever since 25 July 1945, been the U.S. regime, which has perpetrated most of the worldâs coups, sanctions, and invasions, after WW II.
This has always been done by the U.S. regime in the name of advancing âdemocracyâ and âfreedomâ and âhuman rightsâ. It has always been done by the very same regime that today is the worldâs biggest violator of each of those alleged values, and that is also the worldâs #1 police state, having a higher percentage of its residents living in prisons than does any other nation on the entire planet.
Any nation which is allied to it shares its immense guilt and hypocrisy, and will, no doubt, likewise be targeted by Russian, and maybe also Chinese, missiles, when America and its NATO finally do unleash their World War III against their âenemiesâ if the intended victims become totally cornered, trapped. But this will surely be a loserâs game on both sides (victimizers, the U.S. and its vassal-nations or âalliesâ; versus victims, such as Russia, China, Iran, Syria, and Libya).
However, for the weapons-profiteers and extraction corporations that (mainly) the U.S. aristocracy control, and that are making money hand-over-fist this way, it will be a âwinningâ game, if nuclear debris can ever be called a âwin,â by anyone who is sane (which billionaires, as individuals with insatiable demands for their own supremacy, strongly tend not to be).
Can anyone more evil and deceitful, and hypocritical, than the U.S. regime and its NATO be imagined? If so, then whom might such a person even possibly be?

Investigative historian Eric Zuesseâs next book (soon to be published) will be AMERICAâS EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitlerâs Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change. Itâs about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the worldâs wealth by control of not only their ânewsâ media but the social âsciencesâ â duping the public.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy