In the last installment, I introduced the false solutions being fed to society with the Great Green Reset agenda which aims at creating a new economic order. This order, as it is being promoted by Mark Carney, Chrystia Freeland, George Soros, Bill Gates, and other minions of the City of London is shaped by a devout belief in depopulation, and world government, and master-slave systems of social control.
These modes of thinking are not new but go back thousands of years and the only way to properly understand the true constitutional nature of the United States of America is to see this nation as the first (albeit imperfect) successful independence revolt from this historic system of oligarchism which established a new system of government not upon systems of hereditary power, but on the consent of the governed and the premise that all humans are created equal with certain inalienable rights which no monarch could grant or remove because they cannot be owned.
This revolution of 1776 also gave rise to a system of political economy that placed value NOT upon the worshiping of money, markets, or some communist utilitarian mechanism, but rather upon the inherent powers of creative reason located in the minds of all citizens. This potentially infinite resource (or “the resource that creates all other resources”) is only expressed IF a nation’s citizens are given the opportunities, means, hope, and inspiration to express them.
The means developed by leading figures of the revolution, to be used by the government with the aim of actualizing those powers of mind included practices of national banking, public credit, selective protectionism, and increasing the productive powers of labor via investments into internal improvements, infrastructure, and scientific progress. None of these practices are taught in modern academia.
Lincoln’s Understanding of this Fact
Abraham Lincoln understood this fact all too well 170 years ago when he said in 1860: “Man is not the only animal who labors; but he is the only one who improves his workmanship. This improvement, he effects by Discoveries, and Inventions.”
This idea was amplified by Lincoln’s leading economic advisor Henry C. Carey who said in 1872: “The more his power of association, the greater is the tendency toward the development of his various faculties; the greater becomes his control of the forces of nature and the more perfect his own power for self-direction; mental force thus more and more obtaining control over that which is material, the labors of the present over the accumulations of the past…”
If you haven’t noticed it, both Lincoln and Carey recognized that it is by increasing rates of discoveries of unknown organizing principles of the universe which allows our species to translate those new discoveries into greater rates of scientific and technological progress. This overcoming of our limits to growth by leaping to new technologies and resources would then establish a guiding framework for planning future investments into R & D with a focus on activities that push the frontiers of human knowledge with an emphasis on space exploration in the macrosmos and discovering the geometries of the atom (and the relationship of matter to energy) on the microcosmos.
This process embodied by Lincoln and Carey was once known far and wide as the “American System” and it isn’t a coincidence that EVERY SINGLE American president who died while in office (eight in total) was a supporter of this system.
The Origins of the American System
During the crisis of 1783-1791, The newly established American republic was an agrarian economy in financial ruins with no means to pay off its debts or even the soldiers who fought for years in the revolutionary war. It was only a matter of time before the fragile new nation would come undone and be reabsorbed back into the fold of the British Empire.
The solution to this unsolvable crisis was unveiled by Washington’s former Aide de Camp and now Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton who studied the works of the great dirigiste economists like France’s Finance Minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert, and introduced a four-fold solution:
- Consolidate all unpayable state debts into a singular federal debt secured by the issuance of new bonds. This was done via his 1790 Report on Public Credit.
- Tie these new bonds to internal improvements like roads, canals, academies, and industrial growth which would create a qualitatively new form of debt that would permit the nation to produce its way out of poverty which would lead to “the augmentation of the active or productive capital of a country”. In this sense, Hamilton distinguished bad debt from good debt using the important guiding principle that the “creation of debt should always be accompanied with the means of extinguishment.” [to illustrate this more clearly: think of a farmer taking on debt in order to feed a gambling addiction vs investing his loan into new farm supplies and a tractor.] The thrust of this conception was found in his Report on the Subject of Manufactures of 1791.
- Guide that new national power over finance by a system of national banks subservient to the Constitution and the General Welfare (instead of a system of central banks under the British model that ensured nation-states would forever be subservient to the laws of usurious finance). This was illustrated in Hamilton’s 1790 Report on a National Bank and his 1791 On the Constitutionality of a National Bank.
- Use protective measures where necessary to block foreign dumping of cheap goods into the nation from abroad which essentially makes it more profitable to purchase industrial goods and farm products locally rather than from abroad. Hamilton also promoted federal incentives/bounties to encourage private enterprises to build things that would be in alignment with the national interests.
Throughout all of his works, Hamilton is clear that value is not located in land, gold, money, or any arbitrary value favored by followers of the British School like Adam Smith. In defending the growth of manufactures and internal improvements, Hamilton states that “To cherish and stimulate the activity of the human mind, by multiplying the objects of enterprise, is not among the least considerable of the expedients, by which the wealth of a nation may be promoted.”
The Overthrow of the American System
Although City of London-affiliated traitors in America like Aaron Burr established the speculative Bank of Manhattan which started Wall Street, killed Alexander Hamilton in 1804, and derailed many of Hamilton’s grand designs, the system was never completely destroyed despite the decades of attempts to do so. In 1824, the great German economist Frederick List came to America with the last surviving leader of 1776 Marquis Lafayette as part of an international effort to revive the sabotaged plans to create a world of sovereign republics modeled on the American experience of 1776.
While this effort failed with Lafayette’s supplication to the scheme of re-instating a French King in 1830 rather than declare himself the President (as I outlined in my recent paper on the Congress of Vienna), List studied Hamilton’s system and was the first to codify it as the American System of Political Economy (1827). This was the system that List transported to Germany by driving rail development, industrial growth, and protectionism under the German Zollverein which finally blossomed under the rule of Chancellor Otto von Bismarck. List’s system was also studied, translated, and applied in Russia by many “American System economists” with the greatest being the Transport Minister and Prime Minister Sergei Witte who oversaw the trans-Siberian railway’s completion and envisioned a line eventually connecting the Americas to Russia via the Bering Straits.
In America, the clash between American vs British Systems defined all major conflicts from 1836 when a drunken racist named Andrew Jackson killed the 2nd National Bank (along with thousands of Cherokee) and brought the nation under the heel of British Free Trade, speculation, and cotton plantation economics. Following the IMF’s protocols that would be imposed on victim nations 150 years later, Jackson canceled all internal improvements in order to “pay the debt” and deregulated the banking system which resulted in the growth of over 7000 separate currencies issued by an array of state banks rendering the economy chaotic, bankrupt and prone to mass counterfeiting.
The defenders of the American System during this period (led by Whigs such as John Quincy Adams, and Henry Clay) played a rear-guard action hoping for an opening to occur at some point. When that opening finally arrived with the victory of Whig President William Harrison in 1840 a glimmer of hope was felt. Harrison swept to power with a mandate to “revive the national bank” and enact Clay’s American System of internal improvements but sadly the new leader found himself dead in a matter of only 3 months with legislation for the 3rd national bank sitting unsigned on his desk. Over his dead body (and that of another Whig president only 10 years later), the slave power grew in influence enormously.
It wasn’t until 1861 that a new president arose who successfully avoided assassination attempts long enough to revive Hamilton’s American System during a period of existential crisis of economic bankruptcy and foreign-sponsored civil war which nearly destroyed the Union in ways not that dissimilar to the situation unfolding in America today.
In my next installment, I will introduce Abraham Lincoln’s revival of Hamilton’s American System with his incredible battle against the forces of Wall Street and the City of London who did everything in their power to ensure the success of the secessionist slave power.
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review, a BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of the ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation. He can be reached at email@example.com
Matthew Ehret is a Senior Fellow at American University in Moscow and Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review, a BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy
“…but on the consent of the governed and the premise that all humans are created equal with certain inalienable rights which no monarch could grant or remove because they cannot be owned”.
Not quite so clear cut as once was-
Life ‘formation’ or ‘creation’?
DNA altering vaccines?
Patented, genetically engineered property?
conceived in vitro or vivo?
ensoulment at conception?
Will abortion be legally classed as destruction of property because of patented genetic altering vaccines?
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office now grants patents on genetically altered “new” animals indicates that such “artificially” created animals are legally being defined as the property of the holder of the patent. The first such patent was granted to Harvard University in April 1988 for a genetically altered mouse which can be effectively used in testing substances and drugs thought to prevent or to treat cancer in humans. The landmark American case regarding the patenting of genetically engineered organisms was Diamond v. Chakrabarty 44 U.S. 303 (1980), decided June 16, 1980 in a 5-to-4 vote by the U. S. Supreme Court. This was a case regarding a “human-made, genetically engineered bacterium capable of breaking down multiple components of crude oil.”
According to some Je wish sources, while destruction of a human embryo is not an act of murder for Je ws, it may be considered an act of murder for non-Je ws, i.e., for Noahides.
Ferfinand, you disparage cinder blocks!
Excellent read. Here we are in the USA, $30 trillion in debt, a nation deliberately deindustrialized by the big corporations and the banks, and a president that is pushing us into a catastrophic war with Russia. Wonder if he’s mindful of the fact that the last president who tried to make peace with Russia and limit nuclear weapons was assassinated in 1963?
Biden has the brain activity of a cinder block. The only question is will he get to 2024 without falling off a stage somewhere and cracking his shriveled dome.
It seems that Matthew J.L. Ehret has a total grasp of the situation. Mr. Ehret has not been hiding in a corner.
I have come across Matthew’s excellent work on many occasions, without even looking for it.
Knowledge of his caliber must exist elsewhere, in many facets and political iterations, and be known by not a paltry few influential thinkers and leaders.
But, I doubt such knowledge as Mr. Ehret has amassed, has ever been even narrowly seen in the mainstream mind-control media.
The intelligence that Ehret holds, existed long before he did.
But Ehret belongs to a rare breed of patriots; the uncompromised, and uncompromising man of action; the stuff America’s founders were made of.
Basically the solution to America’s, problem(s), and a good portion of the world’s also, is readily available.
If a true patriotic faction isn’t picking up the torch of freedom, which men like Mr. Ehret, are trying to keep lit, then it could mean it’s probably over. The power of the oligarchical monopoly might be too entrenched.
Surely there are American political intellectuals who also grasp that.
But if not, with thinkers like Ehret on the scene, they now have no excuse for apathy, unless it be moral debilitation to the point of putrification.
I never considered the possibility, that a present day application an old piece of poignant insight, in its original strength of spirit, would ever apply to the present, but; “these ARE the times that try men’s souls.”
Elvin. The history of the first 100 years of the USA is fascinating but not clearly taught at any level of our education. I guess it takes an “outsider” to look in and objectively comment on a period that really changed the Western world. Unfortunately, only a few Americans will examine the roots of the Republic. BTW do you want tix to Hamilton on Broadway.? The real story?
ferdinand, not sure if you are serious or kidding about tix, but I’m probably not up to that. Thanks
Comments are closed.