Where are you going America?

by Birgit Naujeck, Translation Georg Stein

Lights out, spotlight on! In life, light is rarely shed on people operating in the background who have exerted a destructive influence for so long in recent history. Occasionally, a little light fell on certain British and Anglophile U.S.-Americans – only this period of attention did not last long, nor did it lead to any changes in the goals of these background powers. Only their modus operandi was adjusted, and the staffage became more sophisticated.

The false polarization of Top Down (Keynesians) and Bottom Up (Austrian School) that has blinded so many citizens in the West and almost everywhere in the world to the true history of the U.S. economic system (1) has resulted in hyperinflation, austerity, speculation, and war being used by the oligarchy to destabilize humanity for hundreds of years. As a result, human life is currently being destroyed in unprecedented ways around the globe.

Although the British propagandists did their utmost to maintain the illusion of sanctity of the British system in the minds of their subjects, the undeniable increase in the quality of life and creative thinking expressed by the US system wherever it was applied, became too powerful to ignore.

The U.S. system was to become a global system, functioning between sovereign nations for the progress and mutual benefit of all. In the 19th century, this idea resonated with statesmen and patriots in all parts of the world who were fed up with the old imperial system of British free trade, which had always sought to maintain a divided and monopolized world.

In Germany, the Zollverein, inspired by the U.S. system, had not only united a divided nation but also raised it to a level of productive power and sovereignty that surpassed the monopoly power of the British East India Company. In Japan, U.S. engineers helped build trains financed by a national banking system and a protective tariff during the Meiji Restoration beginning in 1868.

In Russia, American system devotee Sergei Witte, Minister of Transportation and close advisor to Tsar Alexander III revolutionized the Russian economy with U.S.-made trains that ran on the Trans-Siberian Railway lines. Even the Ottoman Empire was not unaffected by the inspiration of progress when the Berlin to Baghdad railroad was begun with the intention of setting in motion a bold program to modernize Southwest Asia.

The British East India Company’s plan to introduce a New World Order and One World Government nationwide for all the people of the earth had been sidelined by the U.S. system of economics. The Empire, however, did not surrender; it had failed to reckon with its will to prevail. The attempt to use the secession of the southern states for the renewed expansion of the power of the British Empire was not the first campaign of the reconquest of the British system after the War of Independence, but it was the most spectacular.

From 1869 to 1872, the world witnessed the exposure of the British operating in the background of the War of Secession in the first supranational arbitration between the federal government of the United States as plaintiff against the government of the United Kingdom, which became known as the Alabama Claims Affair. The Geneva arbitration found Britain guilty of providing covert military aid to the Confederate States of America during the Civil War, which nearly led to the dissolution of the Union between 1861 and 1865, despite the British Neutrality Act.

Although many of Abraham Lincoln’s supporters knew that the extensive Confederate operations in British Canada were crucial to the conduct of the war – and also to Lincoln’s assassination in 1865 –international distractions and corruption within the United States resulted in little more than $15 million in gold compensation being established, while all sins were considered forgotten and the British immediately went back to business as usual.

In 1934, these Anglophiles were again in the spotlight when General Smedley Butler exposed a fascist coup plot against Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) (2) led by the highest ranks of the Anglo-American banking industry. His revelations to Congress and the media again brought to light the Anglophiles crawling in the soul of the U.S. and saved the Republic from an early slide into fascism that would have allied it with the fascist forces of Germany, Italy, Spain, Japan, and Great Britain in the course of the war yet to come.

Communist Soviet Union Leader Stalin made deals with US President Franklin D. Roosevelt

While FDR survived the assassination attempt of 1933, the coup attempt of 1934, and the ongoing war with Wall Street and the City of London, the beam of light rested on those inclined toward the British Empire for a few more years … but then Roosevelt died before he could realize his grand vision.

His allies such as Harry Hopkins, Henry Wallace, Dexter White, Sumner Wells and others who shared his anti-colonial vision of internationalizing the New Deal (3) were destroyed by the new FBI-led fascism of the Cold War, and the British and associated anglophile U.S.-Americans disappeared into the back room where they took power once again, wiping out the remaining pro-U.S. forces in the State Department, dissolving the Office of Strategic Services OSS and reestablishing the U.S. intelligence agencies as the Central Intelligence Agency CIA in 1947, modeled on Military Intelligence Section 6: the MI6.

This new Anglo-American special relationship coincided with the initiation of the Cold War by Winston Churchill in his infamous Fulton Missouri speech of March 5, 1946. That day also marked the signing of the U.K.-U.S. Intelligence Agreement, which gave rise to the modern incarnation of the Five Eyes intelligence apparatus.

The Chicago Tribune five years later published a series of incredible revelations by journalist William Fulton documenting the cancerous infiltration of hundreds of Oxford-trained Rhodes Scholars who had taken over U.S. foreign policy to lead the United States into a Third World War.

FDR with UK Prime Minister Winston Churchill

On July 14, 1951, Fulton wrote:

“Key positions in the United States State Department are held by a network of U.S. Rhodes Scholars. Rhodes Scholars are men who received additional education and indoctrination at Oxford University in England, with bills paid from the estate of Cecil John Rhodes, builder of the British Empire. Rhodes wrote of his ambition to achieve ‘the final restoration of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire.’ The late diamond and gold mining tycoon sought a world federation dominated by Anglo-Saxons.”

An outstanding disciple of William Yandall Elliott, a leading Rhodes scholar at Harvard, was a young misanthropic German academic named Henry Kissinger. A decade before he was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire, Kissinger gave a remarkable speech at an event on British-American relations at London’s Royal Institute for International Affairs in May 1981. At that event, Kissinger described the contrasting worldviews of Churchill and Roosevelt and enthused that he – Kissinger was U.S. secretary of state from 1973 to January 1977 – far preferred Churchill’s postwar view.

He characterized his time as U.S. secretary of state in the British Foreign Office by saying:

“The British were so matter-of-factly helpful that they became a participant in internal U.S. deliberations to a degree probably never practiced between sovereign nations (…) In my incarnation in the White House at that time, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more engaged than the U.S. State Department (…) That was symptomatic.”

At the same time Kissinger spoke these words, another Anglophile traitor had just been installed as Vice President of the United States. George H. W. Bush was not only the son of a Nazi-funded Wall Street instrumentality and a former CIA director himself, but in 1993 he was made a Knight of the Grand Cross and Order of the Bath by Queen Elizabeth II. The disastrous U.S. foreign policy under Ronald Reagan’s leadership in the 1980s can be traced directly to these two individuals.

The moment Kissinger and Bush took turns celebrating the birth of the New World Order, many Oxford Rhodes Scholars flocked to the presidency, led by Oxford roommates Bill Clinton and Strobe Talbott, both of whom also espoused the New World Order doctrine beginning in 1992.

John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr. did their best to once again shed light on the darkness and right the wrongs of this imperial impulse of the Deep State of the U.S. – which in reality never disappeared, just as the loyalists of the United Kingdom in 1776 – instead their personal light was allowed to go out.

The great U.S. leaders of the 19th and 20th centuries mentioned above had in common a commitment to the principles enshrined in the United States Constitution and to the internationalization of those principles in the form of anti-colonial programs to develop railroads and industry for all peoples. This traditional concept of a global system was based on certain principles of open system economics, win-win cooperation, interconnectivity with emphasis on railroads, and defense of national sovereignty. The British system of governance, on the other hand, was based on a closed system, zero-sum thinking, monetarism, and opposed national sovereignty.

The hopes that many U.S. citizens placed in Donald Trump in 2016 to dismantle the Anglo-American network were dashed by the representatives of the British system.

The English-Babylonian Financial System

Very few national leaders know the face of the true adversary. We are dealing with an imperial financial system that now dominates nation-states that are increasingly sovereign in name only. This financial system is the rebirth of the British Empire in the 21st century, which no longer dominates only a large part of the world, but seeks complete domination of the world. The emergence of this imperial financial system began in the 1960s with the creation of the London-based speculative Eurodollar market, a development that led to the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971/1972 (4).

Since then, step by step, we have moved into a realm more and more dominated by the principle of financialization, and the worldwide center of this financial system is the City of London (5). Since 1971, a network of so-called Offshore Financial Centers OFC has also been created, which serves both money laundering and uncontrolled speculation to the detriment of all nations.

This imperial financial system (6) has plundered nations, prevented development, killed millions, and driven nations to war. It is the system that not only plunders Africa and South America, but also imposes forced deindustrialization on the United States and the European Union, and prevents productive economic investment everywhere. All sovereign nations have fallen victim to it.

The introduction of the financial system with floating exchange rates after 1971 marked the end of a paradigm based on physical economic development. A full chronology of the more than the 50-year transformation that followed would read like the script of a bad 1950s science fiction movie and is beyond the scope of this article.

However, the big bang financial restructuring of the City of London, carried out in 1986 by then British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, is particularly noteworthy. This not only reestablished London as the financial capital of the world but pushed the entire world toward financialization and deregulation, leading to developments such as the repeal of Glass-Steagall banking segregation in the United States in 1999, as well as many other disastrous changes.

The financial power of completely unregulated OFCs, together with their sponsorship from London, has changed the entire face of world finance and increasingly relegated sovereign governments to a secondary role with respect to banking and monetary policy.

Today, enormous amounts of money flow through OFCs, none of it is under the control or supervision of any sovereign government, and almost all of it is used for pure financial speculation, the contrary of actually building anything useful, like a power plant, a factory, or a hospital. Of the ten largest OFCs, eight are located in British Crown Dependencies, British Overseas Territories or former British colonies, and their financial operations are closely intertwined with the City of London.

Entire nations are now dominated by the London OFC financial octopus, and the axioms of this speculative financial system can be found in every corner of the globe. The operations of the so-called too-big-to-fail major banks are also incestuously intertwined with this global speculative colossus.

Russiagate – just another scandal?

Since 2020, with the world once again caught between two opposing systems – multipolar versus unipolar – the light has turned to the dark side of the U.S. as the scheme known as Russiagate, which promised to undo the 2016 election and accelerate the U.S. war with Russia – and China? – has lost what vestiges of viability it once enjoyed.

Richard Grenell has poured more water on the mills of the Russiagate myth by forcing the release of thousands of pages of testimony and ancillary evidence from 53 individuals, including many senior deep-state operatives embedded in the Obama State Department, Cabinet, and Five Eyes intelligence apparatus. Much of this testimony revealed that leading players in the effort to bring down Trump admitted to Congress that they knew of no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, despite lying to the media for years that such collusion existed.

This testimony and collateral evidence also revealed that Trump’s allies, such as Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, and George Papadopoulos, were purposefully entrapped by the FBI and CIA. Emails from FBI Counterintelligence Director Bill Priestap were particularly candid, asking:

“What is our goal? Truth/confession or get him to lie so we can prosecute or fire him?” (7).

In the midst of this ongoing drama, it has become increasingly clear that the Deep State cannot be categorized as a creature of the left, as many Trump supporters foolishly do. In fact, many of the most psychotic participants in this process can be found in the so-called U.S. right, who have publicly declared their allegiance to Donald Trump while spreading the myth of Russia as the enemy and obscuring the true role of British intelligence.

Key figures in this group, who have played and certainly continue to play a dangerous role as right-wing gatekeepers of the Empire, include Trump’s former adviser Steve Bannon, who repeatedly lied about Russian interference in the Trump election campaign, and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Pompeo not only led a mission to destroy Julian Assange for more than two years, accusing him of being a stooge of Vladimir Putin but also withheld key information provided to him by former NSA chief technology officer and whistleblower Bill Binney, with whom he met in October 2017 at Trump’s request. At that meeting, Binney presented the results of the forensic investigation he had conducted into the Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails published on WikiLeaks, which showed that they had not been hacked but had been downloaded internally onto a USB stick by someone in the DNC itself.

In his affidavit in the Stone case, Binney repeated the argument he had previously made to Pompeo:

“WikiLeaks did not receive stolen data from the Russian government. Intrinsic metadata in the publicly available files on Wikileaks shows that the files Wikileaks acquired were delivered on a medium such as a thumb drive.”

Had Pompeo disclosed these findings in 2017, the entire Russiagate affair could have ended much sooner … and saved Julian Assange from what he is about to face at the hands of the Empire.

Even CrowdStrike President Shawn Henry admitted in newly released testimony that his private information security firm, hired by the FBI to have sole control of the DNC servers, could find no evidence of a hack.

Both Pompeo and Bannon are among the loudest neoconservative voices who promoted war with Russia and China while projecting the feeble image of their support for the confused and beleaguered president. Trump is labeled a threat by these Russia-gate orchestrators based on the simple fact that he supports nationalism as well as industry within America, on the one hand, and has long advocated positive relations with Russia and China, on the other.

Without the vital alliance with Russia and China, there would be no multipolar alternative to the collapsing Western financial system, and any hope of saving the Middle East, Africa, Asia, or even the Western alliance would be nil at this point.

Trump’s very existence as a U.S. force advocating a tendency to avoid war, defend national sovereignty, and cooperate with other nation-states in building major projects around the world and in space is itself an intolerable threat to the Empire that has been responsible for the deaths of eight U.S. presidents, orchestrated every major war of the 19th and 20th centuries, and conjured up the Ukraine War.

It was and is the same Empire that went out of its way to convince Trump that he had no choice but to take a hard line on China amid the coronavirus hysteria in order to win the upcoming election, going so far as to condemn Xi Jinping as complicit in the spread of Covid-19 and to pull out of the Open Skies Treaty.

In tracing the origins of the anti-China line that Pompeo and Bannon promulgate, one is immediately and directly catapulted to the doorstep of British intelligence officer Niall Ferguson. Another driving force behind the origins of the “China should pay the U.S. for causing the pandemic” formula is none other than the British neoconservative Henry Jackson Society, whose founding principles were signed by Sir Richard Dearlove.

As the light increasingly shines on Anglophiles within the United States, time is running out to respond appropriately to these emerging shadow people. Only a strong commitment by patriotic forces in the U.S. and other Western nations to ally with Russia and China to bring a new multipolar system into being can put the U.S. back on the tracks envisioned by leaders such as Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, and John F. Kennedy. All of humanity would benefit.

The Late Queen Elizabeth II of the U.K.

The British One-Party-Solution

Today we are essentially dealing with a single global British party. Since 1971, starting in London, they have created a global oligarchic consensus that today encompasses both Wall Street and the European Union, as well as most of the so-called supranational institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Trade Organization. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) as well as the United Nations (UN) with all its organizations are also subject to the dictates of this single party.

This oligarchic consensus has an agenda: to limit national sovereignty – or abolish it altogether – to impose neo-Malthusian population control, to ban industrial and scientific progress in the name of combating man-made climate change, and to implement further financial reforms that will increase the already overwhelming power of the financial interests based in the City of London.

Looking at the proposals of Mark Carney, Gordon Brown, and others – such as Carney’s article in the April 16, 2020 issue of The Economist – it is crystal clear that the British interests they represent intend to use the plandemic to advance precisely the agenda cited above. London’s intention is to emerge from this crisis with a more powerful global green financial dictatorship, accompanied by an increasing surrender of national sovereignty.

King Charles III of the U.K.

The possible revival of the true United States.

A commentary by Caroline Elkins (7) published in the New York Times on June 4, 2022, entitled The Imperial Fictions Behind the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, uses the Queen’s Jubilee to thoroughly debunk some myths of the British Empire, not least the myth of the so-called Commonwealth:

“For well over a century, Britain’s claim to global greatness rested on its empire. Extending over a quarter of the world’s land mass, the British Empire was the largest in history. After spearheading the abolition movement, Britain evolved into a champion of liberal imperialism, or a civilizing mission, imposing development policies on its 700 million colonized subjects that adhered to racial hierarchies and paved their way into the modern world.”

The current intent of the British oligarchy is not only to pit the United States against Russia and China but also to turn these two, as well as a host of other nations, against the United States in order to manipulate all sides into an irreversible geopolitical conflict.

In doing so, they rely on their ability to identify ideologies and weaknesses in various nations and cultures. In the U.S., anti-communism is easy fodder for British intentions, and this is reinforced by the human rights lobby created by the Deep State, which labels China, Russia, and a number of other nations as totalitarian states and thus enemies of our Western “free democratic system.”

In other parts of the world, the decades-long attempt to portray Yankee imperialism as the main cause of evil in the world has been an easy British ruse, picked up by gullible leftists and others. A failure of historical memory prevents many nations from recognizing that the United States was the world’s leading anti-colonial nation until 1945 and that it was only after Franklin Roosevelt’s death that the British succeeded in sabotaging the original intent of the Bretton Woods system and preventing the intended rapid economic development of the former European colonies.

A common mission

Who is harmed by a friendship between China and the USA? Who would be harmed by a friendship between Russia and the USA? Certainly not the people of either of these countries. Friendship offers the reduction of strategic and military tensions, increased cooperation in trade and production, increased cooperation in science and space exploration, and cooperation in rebuilding the world’s health care system. Friendship is the prerequisite for freedom and peace.

Who benefits from the above-mentioned enmity? In his comments, for example, former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, now president of the Asia Society Policy Institute, gloated in April 15, 2020, South China Morning Post, that the economic impact of the plandemic – at least in his view – cripples the Belt and Road Initiative.

It is important to recognize that this fight is not fundamentally about money. Yes, the financial empire squatting in the City of London and spreading its tentacles throughout the European Union, Wall Street, and elsewhere is bankrupt and determined to save itself at the expense of the rest of the world, but there is a deeper motivation for their actions:

The neo-feudalist British oligarchic system hates the creative potential in every human being and is determined to stop all scientific and technological progress. And they hate national sovereignty and the potential of nation-states to work together for the common good.

In the current crisis, the only solution is to eradicate this British disease and bring sovereign nations together in a common cause to rebuild health care systems, restore the physical economy, and cooperate in science and space. Nations must regain their sovereignty over monetary and credit policies and begin to work together to build things that humanity needs.

Russia, China, India, and other nations of the world are rapidly organizing under the new cooperative framework, the operating principles of which were beautifully outlined in President Putin’s recent keynote speech at the Eurasian Economic Union Summit on May 26, 2022.

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting of the State Council Presidium at the Kremlin in Moscow on May 25, 2022.

In his speech, which should be read in its entirety, Putin stated:

“Greater Eurasia is a great civilizational project. The main idea is to create a common space for cooperation among regional organizations on an equal footing. The Greater Eurasian Partnership should change the political and economic architecture and guarantee stability and prosperity across the continent – taking into account, of course, the different development models, cultures, and traditions of all nations.”

If the U.S. can accomplish anything sensible from this point forward, it will have to be the reactivation of those strong policy orientations that Trump netted during his tarnished presidency. In doing so, the United States must orient itself away from the Anglo-American doctrine of world government and toward a cooperative policy alongside partner nations in Eurasia and the global South.

All of our present and future depend on it.


Sources and Notes:

(1) In the book Hamilton versus Wall Street: The Core Principles of American System Economics, published by American System Now (ASN), Nancy Spannaus (ASN president) did two things: First, she has written the most concise overview of the origins of the American system of political economy in modern times, focusing on the figure of Alexander Hamilton as the first U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, and second, she has outlined the necessary paths available to the U.S. and other nations if they are to avoid disintegration and a world war that hangs overhead like a modern sword of Damocles.

(2) Smedley Butler is generally left out of U.S. history. To mention a man who prevented a Wall Street coup against FDR detracts from the history of peaceful respect for the government from the beginning of time until January 6, 2021. If mention is made of the scandal that erupted when Butler told how Mussolini ran over a little girl with his car, it is hard to forget the friendly relations of the U.S. government with Mussolini.

Interestingly, it was Cornelius Vanderbilt IV who had been in the car with Mussolini and told his friend Smedley Butler about it, who later told in his autobiography about a second coup attempt on Wall Street that he had exposed to Eleanor Roosevelt and thus to her husband, and therefore successfully prevented. For some reason, Vanderbilt is never portrayed as a savior of the U.S. government. The messenger – Smedley Butler – is celebrated, if anyone knows him.

Read more in Butler’s writing War Is a Racket, one of the most eloquent denunciations of U.S. foreign policy ever written:

“War is a racket – and always has been. It is possibly the oldest, by far the most profitable, and certainly the most vicious. It is the only one on an international scale. It is the only one where the profits are accounted for in dollars and the losses are accounted for in human lives.”

(3) Franklin Roosevelt rallied the U.S. population behind the battle cry, “There is nothing to fear but fear itself,” and threw the moneylenders out of their temple by introducing Glass-Steagall and activating public credit through the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

Renewed faith in the power of sovereign governments to bring about incremental change by activating the principles of the American system faded the belief that world government was the only option to secure peace. As a result, the British Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) had to reorient its program. Change does not always come easily to an empire, however, and after investing decades of energy in reclaiming the United States, the British made a violent attempt to destroy FDR.

(4) Revisionist historians, largely funded by the British Roundtable/Chatham House and its American branch, the Council on Foreign Relations, have for 75 years suppressed the true anti-imperial nature of the founding intentions of Bretton Woods and the postwar order centered on the United Nations.

At the Bretton Woods conference, held in New Hampshire from July 1-20, 1944, the two opposing paradigms collided. On the one hand, the U.S. system of anti-colonialism fought for a system of win-win cooperation and multipolarism, while on the other hand, the British system of the Malthusian zero-sum system pushed for unilateral Anglo-Saxon dominance over the world.

Although this conference is associated with the creation of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), it is incorrectly assumed to have been the creation of John Maynard Keynes. Keynes’s role as representative of the British Empire, similar to his earlier role at Versailles in 1919, was characterized by a desire to shape the terms of a post-national-state world order on behalf of the City of London at any cost.

Unlike Keynes, FDR’s anti-colonial program was championed by his close allies Harry Dexter White and Treasury Secretary Henry Morganthau. White fought tooth and nail to ensure that Britain would not be in the driver’s seat of the emerging economic system or the important mechanisms of the IMF, which he would later head. He ensured that the colonial preferential economic system that Britain used to maintain free trade exploitation in its empire was destroyed and that the pound sterling no longer played a primary role in world trade. Instead, a system of fixed exchange rates was put in place to ensure that speculation could not overtake national growth strategies, and the dollar, then backed by a powerful physical economic platform, formed the backbone of world trade.

At this early stage, Russia, or rather the Soviet Union, was still happy to be a founding member of the IMF and World Bank, which were supposed to be cheap lenders for long-term, low-interest, high-tech global development.

Stalin commented on support for FDR’s postwar mutual interest system:

“Can we rely on the activities of this international organization to be sufficiently effective? They will be effective if the great powers who bore the brunt of the war against Hitler’s Germany continue to act in a spirit of unanimity and harmony. They will not be effective if this essential condition is violated.”

Just as the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) was used like a national bank to finance thousands of major infrastructure, transportation, energy, and water projects during the New Deal, and just as Glass-Steagall broke the monopoly of private speculative finance over the productive economy, these New Dealers wanted to use the World Bank and IMF to make long-term, low-interest productive loans for long-term mega-infrastructure projects around the world – not just for the reconstruction of Europe.

After FDR’s death, Harry Dexter White’s post as IMF director was rescinded and he was labeled a communist agent. Henry Wallace was removed for similar reasons and worked with White on a presidential bid in 1948 as a third-party candidate. William Willkie, who had talked with Roosevelt about forming a new party, died in October 1944, and Roosevelt’s right-hand man Harry Hopkins, who did most to establish a close friendship with Stalin, died in 1946, the same year Churchill ushered in the Cold War, in which the former allies were at each other’s throats for the next 70 years while he dropped atomic bombs on defeated Japan.

The Keynesian model of government that permeated the postwar operating system ensured that the dictates of the City of London, now dominating the World Bank and IMF, were implemented. Exploitation and oppression returned.

(5) The City of London is more than 800 years old, arguably older than the United Kingdom itself, and it has been the financial center of the world for more than 400 years. In the Middle Ages, the City of London, also known as the Square Mile or simply the City, was divided into 25 ancient boroughs, each presided over by an Alderman. This is still the case today. In addition, there was the ominous City of London Corporation or simply the Corporation, which is the municipal governing body of the City. This body also still exists today.

Although the origins of the Corporation cannot be accurately dated, as no original charter has ever been found to form its legal basis, it has retained its functions to this day based on the Magna Carta.

The Magna Carta is a charter of rights adopted by King John Ohneland in 1215, which states that “the City of London shall have/enjoy its ancient liberties.” In other words, the legal function of the corporation was never questioned, reviewed, or re-evaluated, but left in accordance with its ancient liberties. That is, they are free to act as they please.

And it gets worse. The Corporation does not report to the British government. That means the British government does not currently have the power to undermine the Corporation of the City’s decisions on how to run the world’s largest financial center. The City has a separate electoral system that allows corporations to vote on how their separate government should be run. It also has its own private police force and court system.

The corporation is not limited to the City of London. The City Remembrancer is tasked with acting as a channel of communication between the Corporation and the Sovereign (the Queen), the Royal Household, and Parliament. The Remembrancer thus acts as a reminder, some would even say enforcer, of the will of the Corporation. This office has been held by Paul Double since 2003, although it is not clear who awards this unelected office.

Double has the right to act as an official lobbyist in the House of Commons and sits to the right of the Speaker’s chair to scrutinize and influence any legislation that he believes affects the Corporation’s interests. In addition, he also appears to have the right to review any bill as it is being drafted and may even make comments that influence the final outcome. He is the only non-elected person allowed to enter the House of Commons.

The official City of London website states that the City has its own electoral system because:

“The City is the only area in the country where the number of employees significantly exceeds the number of residents, and to be truly representative of the population, it provides a voice for City organizations to have a say in how the City is run.”

Employees, however, have no say at all. The City organizations they work for have some voting rights based on the number of employees, but they don’t consult with those employees, and many of them don’t even know that such elections are taking place. What seems like an absurd level of insanity is what has made the world’s largest financial center since the 16th century. So the question arises: if the City of London has preserved its ancient freedoms and maintained its global financial power, has the British Empire really disappeared?

(6) A system cannot kill; it needs people to do so. Walther Rathenau, Woodrow Wilson, Dr. Chaim Weitzmann, Benjamin Disraeli, Vladimir Lenin, Dr. Jacob de Haas and others have spoken in the style, “Elected governments seldom rule,” that there is an international organization led by the British royal family that is directing the destinies of the world in their interests and seeking a New World Order with the goal of One World Government.

(7) The declassified evidence also revealed that James Comey’s FBI not only held a meeting with Barack Obama and a team of officials in the Oval Office to discuss the entrapment methods targeting Michael Flynn, but that FBI Deputy Director Peter Strzok ordered the FBI to keep the Operation Razor investigation open against Flynn, despite the agency’s public commitment on January 5, 2017, to shut down the operation after three months of surveillance found no evidence of Russian collusion.

That extension gave Comey time to arrange the casual meeting between his agents Strzok and Bill Priestap in Flynn’s office on Jan. 26 to discuss the substance of Flynn’s conversation with Russian Ambassador Kislyak, in which the general bit the bullet and told the lie that he had relayed his conversation to the vice president. All original notes of the meeting, purportedly made by the two agents who interviewed Flynn, were promptly lost and replaced with heavily redacted comments by Strzok’s mistress, Lisa Page. Other evidence that became public revealed that three dozen Obama officials and intelligence officials submitted unmasking requests to the FBI-enforced Justice Department to release Flynn’s name in the recorded transcripts of conversations with the Russian ambassador.

(8) Caroline Elkins also refers to the repressive British operations in Kenya and Malaya, about which she has written extensively in several books. Her latest book, Legacy of Violence: A History of the British Empire, documents the numerous crimes of the British Empire in 896 pages.


About Author: Birgit Naujeck, born in 1963, did not grow up in the GDR, but was socialized by it. She worked for many years in different countries as a project manager in information technology. The nature and environmentalist currently live on the Rhine but is already working on realizing her childhood dream: a life in nature with animals and humans. From her opposition to technocracy, she clearly opposes 5G, transhumanism, eugenics, and the disembodiment of our language, which leads to the rewriting of history and gender.

First published August 12th, 2022 at rubikon.news. Reproduced under CC 4.0 

SOURCEThe Human: Jack, Orage & friends. the Jack Heart writings

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

3 COMMENTS

  1. Birgit Naujack states:
    “A failure of historical memory prevents many nations from recognizing that the United States was the world’s leading anti-colonial nation until 1945 and(…)”.
    Apparently, she has forgotten the enormity of US intervensiones in Latin America, Cube, Haiti, The Phillipines and China from 1827 until (and maybe continuing under) the times of the Rosweldt presitencies!
    Otherwise, I completely agree with her depiction of the Rhodes Scholars as slaves of Anglo-Scottish crown and of the City of London