Alexis: I have always appreciated the work of Brother Nathanael Kapner. He is one of the many voices out there who unflinchingly opposes the Zionist war in Syria and indeed around the Middle East. Because he was born a Jew and because he has been fighting against the New World Order and the Zionist Mafia, NWO agents and organizations hate him.
The Anti-Defamation League, a thought-police organization, calls people like Brother Kapner virulent anti-Semites. The ADL specifically condemns Brother Kapner for saying that many Jewish radicals are promulgating pornography in America and elsewhere.
But the simple fact is that scholarly studies by Jewish academics conclude the same thing. And the interesting thing is that the ADL has yet to condemn those scholarly studies. For example, Jewish scholar Nathan Abrams of Bangor University declares in his recent work The New Jew in Films, which was published by Rutgers University Press—hardly an anti-Semitic institution:
“Older generation of Jewish filmmakers and actors, here [Woody] Allen, [Stanley] Kubrick and [Ron] Jeremy, arguably not only increased the Jewishness of their work, but updated it to match the new post-1990 sensibility by defining it in increasingly sexualized (and pornographic) terms.”
Other Jewish scholars such as Josh Lambert reluctantly and indirectly argue the same thing, going further to say that, from the very beginning, Jewish lawyers and organizations oppose virtually every single law against obscenity and sexually explicit material in the United States.
In an article published by Haaretz, Lambert says that “Some Jews use obscenity to fight anti-Semitism, while others use it to rewrite traditional Jewish stories in a contemporary idiom.”
People like Larry David and Sarah Silverman, says Lambert, are challenging the “family-friendly culture” in America and are “asserting their Jewishness by glorifying obscenity.”
Both Abrams and Lambert are praised in the academic world for saying the same thing that Kapner is saying! The Journal of American History declares:
“Josh Lambert’s Unclean Lips is brilliant not only for its erudition and wit but also for the freshness and originality of its insights into the critical role that Jews have played in the history of American obscenity.”
Publishers Weekly adds that Lambert “presents what is engaging material, demonstrating how ‘taboo words and explicit representations of sex were meaningful to American Jews during the 20th-century . . . in contingent and historically specific ways.”
The American Jewish Archives Journal concurs:
“Lambert evidently enjoyed reading, thinking, and writing about his source materials…Thoroughly researched and thoughtful volume.”
Abrams and Lambert are geniuses, but Kapner is a virulent anti-Semite because he and Abrams and Lambert have all come to the same conclusions!
Obviously we are facing an intolerable situation here. It gets even more interesting. Back in 2004, Abrams approvingly cited E. Michael Jones who wrote an article in 2003 meticulously documenting that Jewish involvement in pornography is real.
Jones was again branded an anti-Semite, but Abrams received great accolades for his work. By 2007, the Southern Poverty Law Center was already saying that Jones is an anti-Semitic canard.
The fact is that Jones has spent much of his life fighting against anti-Semitism. There are indeed some people out there who subscribe to the idea that the Jewish behavior is genetic. As we have seen in the past, this idea is morally repugnant, philosophically incoherent, and intellectually worthless. One can say that it is arguably anti-Semitic.
If it were true that the Jewish behavior is genetic, then there wouldn’t be people like Gilad Atzmon, Brother Nathanael Kapner, Henry Makow, Norman Finkelstein, Mortimer Adler, Nicholas Donin, Israel Shamir, etc. If we follow the genetic theorists consistently, people like Kapner must be some kind of genetic defects. In fact, if the genetic theorists were right, then Christ was not born of Jewish parents. (People have told me that!)
If the genetic theorists want us to take them seriously, then they need to explain their position in a logical and coherent fashion. So far, none of them has been able to explain the internal contradiction that is inherent in their worldview. And this has been my frustration with these people.
If they continue to propound one irrational statement after another and expect thinking people to take them seriously, then there are at least two conclusions one can draw: they either do not give a flip about logic and reason, or they love their cherished ideology so much that they cannot give it up. They think they are following science, when in fact they are following an ideology. In the process of time, they have forced that ideology on biology and suddenly called it “science,” despite the fact that it is antithetical to logic and reason.
For example, when Harry Ostrer’s book Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People came out, it was hailed as a scientific breakthrough because it gave credence to the belief that the Jewish behavior is genetic. But when asked about the “scientific” sources and methods that he used throughout the book, Ostrer went berserk.
The source of the Jewish behavior is not biology but the Talmud. It is a book which essentially rejects the moral and political order and replaces it with chaos, subversion, and hatred toward all mankind. This is where the issue lies, not in biology. Our VT colleagues Mike Harris and Preston James have pointed out some of these things quite well. The genetic theorists owe people like Brother Nathanael Kapner a serious explanation.
We need people like Kapner out there who will tell the truth, no matter what the consequences. I was delighted when he gave me permission to publish his open letter to Putin. You may choose not to believe his religious point of view, and you may even disagree with what he has to say. But at least try to understand his position and show some respect. Kapner is not an enemy; he is actually an ally—and a brother to some. Here is the open letter.
Dear President Putin:
With Paul Craig Roberts’ request to become a Russian citizen being well received by Moscow, I also feel inspired to make a request of you.
Unlike Roberts, I have not been accused of being a ‘Russian agent’ by the Washington Post but I have been accused by the Anti-Defamation League of being a “virulent anti-Semite.”
That’s pretty hard to pin on me since I was born of Jewish parents and raised in the synagogue. I can even read Hebrew since I went to Sabbath School growing up Jewish.
Many Jews agree with me regarding pernicious Jewish influence here in America. Four Jews became Orthodox Christians through my ministry. My bishop met two of them.
I was the first to defend you against the media’s smear campaign starting with The Difference Between Putin and Obama. And I foresaw that you would make a major impact on world affairs with my “How Putin Will Change The World.”
My Videos, viewed by millions, reveals the real Vladimir Putin as a devout Orthodox Christian and a virtuous statesman. They include “The Religion Of Vladimir Putin” and “Is Putin Controlling US Elections?”
You’re my brother in Christ, dear Vladimir, as I am a fellow Orthodox Christian with the Russian Church. (As much as I admire Paul Craig Roberts, he cannot make that claim.)
HERE IS MY REQUEST…
Would you invite me to Russia to conduct my Street Evangelism? I hold up the Cross on median strips across America including 9th and Pennsylvania in DC and Times Square.
That would be a great honor. Especially if I could do it in Red Square where the Bolsheviks once claimed a faux victory.
But our trophy is the Cross. And Russia, unlike America, honors Christ, not His enemies.
First published in December 2016.
 See for example Yonit Moses, “Jewish banks masterminded crisis,” Y-Net News, October 21, 2010.
 See for example Jay A. Gertzman, Bookleggers and Smuthounds: The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999); for similar studies, see Edward W. Bristow, Prostitution and Prejudice: Jewish Fight Against White Slavery, 1870-1939 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982).
 Nathan Abrams, The New Jew in Film: Exploring Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Cinema (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012), 72.
 Josh Lambert, Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2014); for similar studies, see Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005); Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
 Josh Lambert, “‘Dirty Jews’ and the Christian Right,” Haaretz, February 3, 2014.
 Nathan Abrams, “Triple-exthnics,” Jewish Quarterly, Winter 2004.
 E. Michael Jones, “Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos,” Culture Wars, May 2003.
 “12 Anti-Semitic Radical Traditionalist Catholic Groups,” Southern Poverty Law Center, January 16, 2007.
 “‘Jews a Race’ Genetic Theory Comes Under Fierce Attack by DNA Expert,” Jewish Daily Forward, May 7, 2013.
 “’My Life as a Putin Stooge’: Paul Craig Roberts Expertly Trolls Feds, WashPo,” Sputnik News, November 30, 2016.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book, Kevin MacDonald’s Metaphysical Failure: A Philosophical, Historical, and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and Identity Politics. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.