by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
About two years ago, on December 19, 2020, Gospa News was the first online newspaper in the world to reveal the sensational and shameful conflict of interest of the Anglo-American zoologist Peter Daszak, appointed to the first Task Force created by the WHO to investigate the origin of SARS-Cov-2 in Wuhan, after a resolution presented to the general assembly by the European Union, despite having worked precisely in the Wuhan Institute of Virology suspected of having created and “let escape” the pandemic virus of COVID-19.
Two months later, in February 2021, the Daszak case became a scandal of global significance when even some international newspapers such as the British Daily Mail and the German Die Welt highlighted the same problem by recalling, as we had already done in the investigations of the WuhanGates cycle, that the British researcher president of the EcoHealthAlliance of New York (funded by the Obama-Biden administration, by Anthony Fauci and by Bill Gates to conduct chimeric experiments on coronaviruses with enhanced virulence in China), had also been the one who had inspired the letter of 27 scientists from The Lancet magazine who denied the thesis of the artificial origin of SARS-Cov-2 after the research of some Indian biologists who “were forced to retract it”, according to the late virologist Luc Montagnier.
Recently the chairman of the Covid-19 Commission of the same British magazine supported the opposite thesis on the probable artificial origin of the pandemic virus.
Now we reveal that something similar repeated!
The virologist co-chair of the SAGO group (Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens) commissioned by the World Health Organization to investigate the origin of the Covid-19 virus is the Institut Pasteur researcher who followed the SARS experiments on lab-built recombinants with HIV/AIDS viral enhancement at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
THE FRENCH VIROLOGIST IN THE WHO SAGO GROUP
His name is Jean-Claude Manuguerra and he is Director of Research and head of the Environment and Infectious Risks Unit, as well as head of the Biological Emergency Intervention Unit (CIBU) and deputy head of the French National Reference Center for Antiviruses, at the ‘Institut Pasteur in France.
Not only. Precisely by virtue of his long experience in China, he is also among the experts of the SENET group (Sino-European Health Networking Hub), a development center of a Sino-European virological research networkfunded by the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 project (convention of Grant No. 825904).
There is no doubt that he is one of the world’s leading biologists as stated in his curriculum vitae on the official website of the WHO SAGO.
«His expertise lies in virology and animal health. He is also the contact point for the OIE Collaborating Centre of the Detection and Identification in Humans of Emerging Animal Pathogens and the Development of Tools for their Diagnoses at the Institut Pasteur. He was co-director of the National Influenza Centre for Northern France from 1995 to 2003. He chaired the French National Influenza Pandemic Planning Committee from 2003 to 2013 and member of the Steering Committee of the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network coordinated by WHO from 2000 to 2018 (Chair from June 2012 to December 2013)».
Too bad that this brief description lacks the macroscopic conflict of interest that makes it inadequate to investigate a possible laboratory leak of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (acronym WIV).
The reason can be read in the file on the researcher of the Institut Pasteur in Paris on his experience of the first SENET report: «He presented the infectious disease related projects EpiSARS (EC funded, 2004-2007) and RIVERS (EC funded, 2007-2010) and his current work on Risk Assessment for Urban Emergence of Underestimated Arboviruses».
Through EpiSARS he managed the «collaborative projects with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Institut Pasteur of Shanghai».
The same report also specifies:
«Wuhan has strong connections with France, common industrial factories, but also in the domains of mathematics and biology. Wuhan institute of Virology has been a critical collaboration partner for Institut Pasteur France. The Institut Pasteur Shanghai was created as a follow-up of the ongoing collaborations between Institut Pasteur France with China. It is now intensifying already existing collaborations and creates new opportunities for collaborations with stakeholders in China, especially in Shanghai».
These ties are related precisely to the EpiSARS project financed by the European Commission chaired by the Italian Romano Prodi within which, as we revealed in the WuhanGates 9 investigation, the “Chinese batwoman” Shi Zhengli, director of the Infectious Diseases Research Center of the WIV, augmented the 2003 SARS virus by recombining it with a plasmid infected with the very dangerous HIV.
FROM SARS VIRUSES WITH HIV TO MODERNA VACCINES
The traces of the AIDS pathogen inside SARS-Cov-2 genomic sequence were detected by the study of researchers at the Kusuma School of Biological Sciences IIT Delhi and confirmed by the virologist Luc Montagnier who, having worked at the Pasteur Institute until 2000 and then at the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, knew well the intrigues between France, China and the US.
The great French biologist, winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008 precisely for the discovery of HIV, however limited himself to denouncing, perhaps out of patriotic love, only those between China and US.
In fact, alongside the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the University of North Carolina developed the most dangerous experiments on the laboratory-enhanced viruses from which SARS-Cov-2 was born, conducted by Professor Ralph Baric under the supervision of Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and thanks to the grants financed by the Pentagon’s military agency DARPA to the American pharmaceutical company Moderna of Cambridge (MA) and Metabiota of San Francisco (CA).
Even the French bio-engineer Pierre Bricage, an expert in bacteriological weapons as a NATO lecturer, confirmed the traces of HIV in Sars-Cov-2 arguing, as Dr. Joseph Mercola recently did, that it was an experiment to develop a basin against AIDS.
As is known, Moderna patented the active ingredient of its antiCovid mRNA gene serum 9 months before the outbreak of the pandemic (as discovered by Dr. David Martin), further created in the laboratory in 2016 a human gene with 19 nucleotides identical to those of SARS -Cov-2 (as shown by a research published recently and also signed by Professor Giorgio Palù) and in the recent months has started its clinical trials for an anti-AIDS vaccine.
Who cares if to do so there have been 6.65 million deaths from Covid-19 in the world and if tens of thousands are dying from the experimentation on the human population of the new pharmacological biotechnologies used in the anti-Covid vaccines?
THE MONSTROUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN THE WHO
In light of what has been written, it seems truly singular that the WHO has chosen Dr. Manuguerra as co-chair of the SAGO task force for the search for the origin of SARS-Cov-2.
Precisely because the Paris researcher took care of the Wuhan Institute of Virology when it was funded by the European Commission which entrusted the task of scientific supervision to the Pasteur Institute in the “French phase 2004-2007” of the dangerous experiments.
This happened before the “American phase 2009-2016” began, supported by the USAID government agency at the behest of US President Barack Obama and by Peter Daszak’s EHA to which, a few weeks ago, the American National Institute of Health (NIH) removed all contributions for not providing the required documentation on the enhancement of SARS viruses with the technique of Gain Function (GOF) done in China!
But this circumstance appears curious only if one does not remember that the WHO itself is financed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation which has chosen the Ethiopian biologist Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus as director of the UN health agency.
He has thus become himself a puppet of Gates in his global immunization plan promoted with vaccines thanks to the Gavi Alliance and the Rockefeller Foundation, since the 1999 meeting in Bellagio (Como), and thanks to the financing to the Big Pharma Moderna, Biontech and GSK, partner of the Pfizer, which produced the anti-Covid gene serums making billions of dollars.
Not only. The WHO has been a partner in all the coronavirus experiments developed in China by the Obama-Biden administration’s PREDICT project, personally supervised by Fauci who follows all the DURC (Dual-Use Research of Concern) projects, so named because they are aimed at field of research on health therapies can develop bacteriological weapons.
At the end of November, five Republican senators from the US Congress called for the immediate interruption of all DURC experiments with the GOF technique after the latest very dangerous test by Boston University on a strain of SARS-Cov-2 crossed with the Omicron variant in a combination very lethal created thanks to a partial funding from Fauci’s NIAID.
In light of all these intrigues between geopolitical interests and military bacteriological studies, the appointment within SAGO of one of the scientists who helped develop the first chimeric (aka artificial) SARS, believed to be the progenitors of SARS-Cov- 2, becomes very disturbing!
THE “FARCICAL” SAGO REPORT OF JUNE 2022
The first SAGO report released on June 9, 2022 (unlike the previous year’s WHO Task Force report with Daszak who deemed man-made origin unlikely) expressed some «initial recommendations for assessing the possibility of the introduction of SARS-CoV-2 to the human population through a breach in biosafety and biosecurity measures through a laboratory incident».
Also noting the need for «additional investigations should be carried out with the staff in the laboratories tasked with managing and implementing biosafety and biosecurity at laboratories: (1) those in the proximity of the original COVID-19 outbreak working with SARS-like viruses in Wuhan, China and potentially with (2) those located worldwide where early COVID-19 cases have been retrospectively detected before 2020».
In order to «determine the occupational hazards intrinsic to laboratories working with SARS-like CoV and the nature of the studies performed before the first reported COVID-19 cases in Wuhan and whether they involved reverse engineering or gain-of-function, genetic manipulation or animal studies with strains of SARS-like CoV».
Questions that should be re-directed directly to the virologist Manuguerra who for 3 years (2004-2007) worked with the WIV scientists as supervisor of the EpiSARS project funded by EU Commission…
And finally, the SAGO expert group invites to: «Evaluate potential scenarios where a breakdown in biosafety or biosecurity procedures led to a possible laboratory-acquired infection with the studied pathogen».
But also to «Determine if there were any reported biocontainment breaches or laboratory incidents or accidents with SARS-like coronaviruses in biosafety level (BSL2/3/4) laboratories that may have resulted in escape and/or infection of staff members prior to December 2019 where early cases were detected in China».
In the crosshairs of director Ghebreyesus’s task force, however, only the Wuhan Institute of Virology remains and there is no mention of Chapel Hill of the University of North Carolina or the bacteriological laboratories opened by the Pentagon in Ukraine where research on Covid-19 was conducted three months before the discovery of this strain of coronavirus and its naming…
«WHO’s expert group also noted that since lab accidents in the past have triggered some outbreaks, the highly politicized theory could not be discounted» reported an article by the Associated Press in which the position of the French researcher was also highlighted.
«Jean-Claude Manuguerra, a co-chair of the 27-member international advisory group, acknowledged that some scientists might be “allergic” to the idea of investigating the lab leak theory, but said they needed to be “open-minded” enough to examine it» wrote further AP News.
A little short after two years of WHO investigations and 6.65 million deaths from Covid-19. Especially given Dr. Manuguerra’s specific knowledge of the experiments conducted in Wuhan.
An inconclusive report that legitimizes the atrocious and inevitable doubt: does the director general Ghebreyesus want to discover the truth or make Gates happy in concealing it?
But above all it triggers an inevitable question: when will any magistrate on earth arrest Fauci and Gates for this New World Order pandemic they have been planning for decades as denounced by the lawyer Robert F. Kennedy jrand demonstrated by the 63*Wuhan-Gates investigations?
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS
prohibition of reproduction without authorization
follow Gospa News on Telegram
*four particularly long and complex investigations have yet to be translated into English